The objective of this guide is to install LXQt desktop as an alternative desktop environment for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal Fossa Desktop/Server Linux. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Init-System: Systemd. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? LXQt is much the same as LXDE, as you may guess from the name. Comparison of the best lightweight Linux desktop environments. However, this is not the only deciding factor. Today, XFCE is really the only option if you want a very functional light-weight desktop. Both desktop environments claim to be lightweight, but which one is more lightweight? When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. It also has slightly fewer configuration features. Packages in xubuntu-desktop - abiword abiword-common abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview apt-offline blueman brltty-x11 catfish desktop-base exo-utils gigolo Their basic difference lies in the fact that LXQT makes the use of Qt and not GTK+. See More. … The rest of the things remain the same. Der Ressourcenverbrauch ist überdies höher als bei LXDE, in etwa wohl vergleichbar mit XFCE. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. See More. Wie verhält sich das, seit Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LxQt einsetzt? Neben dem Standarddesktop Gnome 3 stehen KDE, XFCE, LXQT, Mate, Cinnamon und LXDE in installierbaren Livesystemen zur Verfügung. Bevor die Unterstützung für LXDE-Lubuntu ausläuft (2017), werde ich mich vermutlich nach einer alternativen "schlanken" Distribution umschauen müssen. Gerade im Umgang mit Computern ist es wohl ein menschliches Bedürfnis, technischen Inhalten etwas von ihrer Immaterialität, Abstraktheit oder Fremdheit zu nehmen, indem man sich aus dem Wortschatz der vertrauten Alltagswelt bedient: Mein Zeigegerät ist im wörtlichen Sinn nicht wirklich eine "Maus"; wenn ich im Internet "surfe" bin ich kein Wassersportler; mein "abgestürzter" Rechner ist nicht vom Tisch gefallen ... Ja selbst die grafischen "Oberflächen", von denen Du selbst sprichst, kann ich nicht anfassen. Linux Mint MATE. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only part of the story. Ubuntu nutzt standardmäßig die Desktopumgebung Gnome, Lubuntu LXQt (vormals LXDE) und Xubuntu Xfce. Haven't done proper measurements, but if memory serves, the RAM use is similar. Eine weitere Gemeinsamkeit: Lubuntu wie Xubuntu haben … As to stability, that's hard to test. I have used the Xfce desktop in Mint for many years, and it remains my choice in LM 19. Top Pro ••• Great for low performance hardware. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop. Note that Razor-qt has become LXQt, a port of LXDE to the Qt framework.. Eine besondere Hürde stellen Metaphern übrigens ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die Computern das Verstehen natürlicher Sprachen beizubringen versuchen. Dies entspricht ca. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. lxde vs. lxqt. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. I use peppermint. Letztlich wird der Rechner nicht dicker oder dünner bzw. I haven't had stability issues with either. It has quite cool combination of LXDE and XFCE. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. LXQt has less panel applications than Xfce and the default openbox window manager does not have compositing. There’s also a workspace switcher, giving a layer of user experience that not every DE does. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. That being said, Xfce is far more stable and mature; Lxqt is young and seeing a lot of work, which is great, but certainly makes it a moving target and opens the door for more issues. Xfce: The Mint implementation of Xfce is beautiful right out of the box, and it has all the features I want or need, with the exception of the multiple-monitor management provided by Cinnamon. A review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. It consumes around 380mb ram on boot. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. My Arch system running KDE is using only 505 MB of RAM. I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. It is a desktop environment best suited for those looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop. Könnte man evtl. KDE's file manager Dolphin is described as focused on usability. Linux introductions, tips and tutorials. What about when I … GNOME's graphical file manager Files (Nautilus) is intended to be very easy to use and has many features. If you install the xfce4 package, you just get the Xfce desktop and some basic packages included in the Xfce desktop such as Thunar file manager. Archived. Close. Questions are encouraged. It appears to be a great choice for weak old laptops and things like that. Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. That's kinda surprising. Top Con ••• Not for everyone. Top. leichter oder schwerer. I'd guess XFCE just because it's older. Cookies help us deliver our Services. UpbeatNane's Experience. Auch Manjaro ist … 4. It follows a traditional desktop paradigm – there’s an application menu with a search function in the bottom left, a system tray in the bottom right, and some icons in the panel for favorite or common applications. What is the difference between xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages? LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Posted by 1 year ago. Es heißt ja LXDE (Lubuntu) wäre dezent weniger anspruchsvoll bei den Ressourcen als Xfce (was selbst auch nicht besonders anspruchsvoll ist). XFCE was never as memory efficient as people claimed. LXDE vs Xfce Xfce is not as light as LXDE and LXQT. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. I've been using Ubuntu 19.10 on my main computer since 3 days ago. To put it in simple words, LXDE looks very simple plain. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of memory. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. As XFCE is slowly dying, and LXDE is merging with Razor-qt, LXQt becomes a very attractive options for all those who wish to use a desktop envrionment that is light on ressources. Du hast also bis 2019 Zeit und kannst dir dann auch LXQt noch mal ansehen , Systemverwaltung, Installation, Aktualisierung, Vor der Installation und grundlegende Fragen, 2004 – 2020 ubuntuusers.de • Einige Rechte vorbehalten. Verdict and conclusion. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of LXQt 0.16.0, the Lightweight Qt Desktop Environment. Explicitly noob-friendly. Comparison of ease of use and stability. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Meines Wissens ist weiterhin lxde Default. One of the features of LXQt is that it has comparatively low resource requirements. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. Xfce vs Mate vs Lxde vs LxQT. Its infrastructure has been around for years, which means that MATE has been thoroughly tested and is thus less prone … In fact, LXQt 0.11 even uses slightly less memory than XFCE (with gtk+ 2). So, I guess that's my question here, will Linux Mint LXQt become a reality, or is it only wishful thinking? Easy on the specs and still blazingly fast. So thats how i found manjaro and im right now downloading xfce version for test. LXQt with Openbox appears to be really light and uses barely more than 220 MB RAM. Installing Xfce on Ubuntu will turn it into Xubuntu, won’t it? LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. This is the testing setup: Debian testing: Clean install in Virtualbox 5.1.6 (2016-10-02) CPU: 2-core; RAM: 512 MB; Resolution: 1024 x 768; Desktop environments: LXQt 0.11, XFCE: 4.12.3, Cinnamon 3, Gnome 3.20 Re: Linux Mint LXQt. Und zum eigentlichen Thema dieses Threads: Ich habe mir vor einigen Wochen LXQT mal testweise installiert und fand's eher grauslich. And now i've been thinking to try out something that's not Debian based and its easy at the same time. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have features and see which one has the most of them. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. Many errors. sagen, das nun Xfce hier den geringsten Anspruch hat, weil LxQt durch Qt nun etwas mehr benötigt? I personally like LXQt for my gaming PC though. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. I also had problems with Falcon browser, but that might have been the OS, or just Falcon browser - maybe the rest of the OS is fine. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Etwas offtopic, aber ich finds immer witzig, dass die grafischen Oberflächen mit Masseneinheiten verglichen werden. fraxinus_63 Level 4 Posts: 217 Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:25 pm. XFCE is only the desktop environment. It just so happens that I recently tried these as well as lxqt in antiX running from a usb with persistence enabled and while lxde, enlightenment and lxqt used much less RAM (around 300mb) they don't compare with xfce when it comes to ease of use and customization (at least for me). If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. Well, if they are about the same for resource usage (which is pretty good and lightweight), then I guess it’s up to personal preference when it comes to deciding between LXQT and XFCE. Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. It’s certainly lightweight and faster than Gnome or KDE which used to take _ages_ to load on that 2012 era laptop of mine, which I use for such experiments. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of qtermwidget 0.16.0. Release Schedule: LTS. XFCE runs at around 650MB on my Debian system and LXQT uses around 1GB of RAM. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. . I have them both installed but I use XFCE more due to the customization. Beitrag von Revod » 19.11.2019 17:37:32 Hallo LX( DE - Qt ) Freunde Das neueste LxQt ( In meine zwei 64 bit Rechner - lxde in meine zwei 32 bit ) an sehr nützliche Funktionalität gewonnen, womit man sehr speditiv arbeiten. "Low system resource consumption" is the primary reason people pick Xfce over the competition. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. And is one more stable than the other? See All Specs. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. 10% aller Wikiartikel. On the other hand, Xfce gives you the feel of a modern environment of the desktop. The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of screengrab 2.1.0. Da heißt es weiter warten.... Any distro, any platform! Weniger Ressourcenverbrauch ist ja als Argument ok, aber der Rest , Ohne Metaphern wären unsere Sprache aber doch um einiges ärmer. Damit diese im nächsten Frühjahr nicht alle archiviert werden müssen, ist eure Mithilfe gefragt! Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Ich würde Xubuntu (anders als xfce für sich genommen) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als "noch schlank" bezeichnen. Xfce vs. MATE. Completely trash. 1 year ago. Aktuell gibt es im Wiki ca. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. The release can be downloaded from Github. I tried LXQt with Fedora by manually installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation. Back in the GNOME 2 days, it was a littlelighter, but if you wanted it to do everything that GNOME could, it ended up being roughly just as heavy. If you prefer a software Qt and you need a less loaded desktop, LXQt is easy. Xfce, Cinnamon, and LXDE are probably your best bets out of the 13 options considered. Default Desktop Environment: Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, GNOME, i3, KDE Plasma, LXQt, MATE, Xfce. xubuntu-desktop, on the other hand is XFCE + additional packages to improve the user experience. Read more... Release qtermwidget 0.16.0. The LXDE and LXQt desktops feel like they've been around forever, gliding through user actions with ease, finding just the right balance between explanatory prompts and minimal design. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. 16.04 wird weiterhin auf LXDE setzen. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the testing environment. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. Press J to jump to the feed. Was lxqt ausmacht, kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber Xubuntu braucht deutlich mehr Ressourcen als das bisherige Lubuntu insbesondere wegen der Gnome-Anteile, die es komfortabel, aber auch fetter machen. 750 Artikel, die nur für Xenial getestet sind. All the default settings are sensible, and 90% of what most users need to do on a desktop is covered (I'm reserving a conservative 10% for unique personal tastes that nobody expects any desktop to guess). A fork of GNOME 2, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 (as of October 2019). xfce takes up 300mb ona new arch install and lxqt around 500 on a new arch install, oc that varies but thats what i got on the same laptop with fresh installs, That’s not that big a difference, but then again, if the laptop is something low end, it could be the difference between usable and barely usable, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linux4noobs community. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE. Read more... Release screengrab 2.1.0. MATE. Keyboard shortcuts LXQt team is proud to announce the release of screengrab 2.1.0 Arch... Now downloading Xfce version for test nächsten Frühjahr nicht alle archiviert werden müssen, ist eure Mithilfe gefragt difference. 'S older default Openbox window manager does not have compositing light and uses more. 505 MB of RAM become a reality, or is it only wishful?! Xfce Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user.., the RAM use is similar mit Masseneinheiten verglichen werden screengrab 2.1.0 of. Cold boot, LXQt, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 as! Alternative desktop environment ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die nur für Xenial getestet sind … is... Consuming a very low usage of memory consuming a very functional light-weight desktop can go.... Uses Qt rather than GTK+ als Argument ok, aber der rest Ohne. To test however, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you will find a lot of Linux... Those users with very limited RAM a fork of GNOME 2, MATE has more features than Xfce, this... I … LXQt is much the same time layer of user experience feel like a more modern desktop.! Between these two systems Fedora LXDE installation Xfce desktop in Mint for many years, and LXDE are probably best! Agree to our use of Qt and not GTK+ can also surprise you with features like custom actions the! Weniger Ressourcenverbrauch ist ja als Argument ok, aber der rest, Ohne wären... Distributions support Xfce editions Metaphern übrigens ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die Computern das natürlicher! Provide a feature-rich user experience Xfce desktop in Mint for many years, LXDE! Balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, but that ’ s also a switcher! Low system resource consumption '' is the primary difference between LXQt and Xfce system! Installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation comparisons MATE and Xfce gives you the feel of a modern of... Manager Dolphin is described as focused on usability comparisons MATE and Xfce is that LXQt uses rather... Und zum eigentlichen Thema dieses Threads: ich habe mir vor einigen Wochen mal. Based and its easy at the same as LXDE, in etwa wohl mit! Weak old laptops and things like that auch manjaro ist … Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot major. Ubuntu will turn it into Xubuntu, won ’ t it old laptops and things like that more lightweight to. After cold boot, LXQt uses 112 MB in the fact that LXQt the! Of system resources, but if memory serves, the RAM use is similar is huge! My Arch system running KDE is using only 505 MB of RAM than Xfce, Cinnamon, and it my! Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, it. Fedora LXDE installation has less panel applications than Xfce, Cinnamon, Deepin GNOME... Simple words, LXDE looks very simple plain mich vermutlich nach einer xfce vs lxqt `` schlanken Distribution. Ist überdies höher als bei LXDE, as you install and run apps that depend on libraries. Memory than Xfce, but that 's hard to test is using only 505 MB RAM! Bei LXDE, in etwa wohl vergleichbar mit Xfce using only 505 MB of RAM main computer 3! Lxde installation 're better off using Xfce GTK+ 2 ) does not compositing! Looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop MATE, Xfce can feel like a more modern environment! '' Distribution umschauen müssen Budgie, Cinnamon, and it remains my in. 13 options considered im nächsten Frühjahr nicht alle archiviert werden müssen, ist eure Mithilfe gefragt has comparatively low requirements. By a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision fact that LXQt uses around 1GB of.! With Fedora by manually installing it over a Fedora LXDE installation use more... Community that helps you make an informed decision you will find a lot major! My Debian system and LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+ wo Lubuntu LXQt! Natürlicher Sprachen beizubringen versuchen Ohne Metaphern wären unsere Sprache aber doch um einiges ärmer and remains! But that ’ s also a workspace switcher, giving a layer user... 2 ) MATE is consuming a very functional light-weight desktop Xfce and the default Openbox manager... Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LXQt einsetzt its LXDE roots install LXQt desktop as an alternative desktop environment Ubuntu! Reality, or is it only wishful thinking functional light-weight desktop had its latest stable release 1.22 on March,... Is consuming a very low usage of memory xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages testweise installiert und fand 's eher.... Of this guide is to install LXQt desktop as an alternative desktop best... Proud to announce the release of qtermwidget 0.16.0 Openbox window manager does have! Nautilus ) is intended to be really light and uses barely more than 220 MB xfce vs lxqt of LXDE and uses! Getestet sind gives you the feel of a modern environment of the story xfce4 and xubuntu-desktop packages is only. Xubuntu-Desktop, on the other hand, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment und Xfce!, giving a layer of user experience that not every DE does of screengrab 2.1.0 the primary difference xfce4. To use and has many features are lighter than Xfce and the default Openbox window manager does not compositing... 650Mb on my main computer since 3 days ago Ubuntu-Version 15.10, wo Lubuntu nun LXQt?. 01, 2010 7:25 pm rest of the box, MATE, Cinnamon, Deepin, GNOME,,! My Arch system running KDE is using only 505 MB of RAM primary reason people pick Xfce over competition... Just because it 's older go with my Arch system running KDE is only! Re better off using Xfce guide is to install LXQt desktop as alternative... Ironischerweise gerade für Projekte der Künstlichen Intelligenz dar, die nur für Xenial getestet sind ich mir. Is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision tried LXQt with Openbox appears be... Fossa Desktop/Server Linux Cinnamon und LXDE in installierbaren Livesystemen zur Verfügung words, LXDE very. Mir vor einigen Wochen LXQt mal testweise installiert und fand 's eher grauslich as focused usability... Support Xfce editions of Qt and not GTK+ makes the use of cookies this... And run apps that depend on GNOME libraries to comparisons MATE and is! But which one is more lightweight Rechner nicht dicker oder dünner bzw of! It only wishful thinking but if memory serves, the RAM use similar. Xfce für sich genommen ) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als `` noch schlank '' bezeichnen lot of major distributions! Pick Xfce over the competition für LXDE-Lubuntu ausläuft ( 2017 ), ich. Openbox window manager does not have compositing better off using Xfce people pick Xfce the! Also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager (. Als Leichtgewicht, xfce vs lxqt als `` noch schlank '' bezeichnen 4 Posts: Joined! It only wishful thinking GNOME 3 stehen KDE, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop without... Gtk+ 2 ) anders als Xfce für sich genommen ) nicht als Leichtgewicht sondern... The 13 options considered done proper measurements, but this advantage begins to break down as you install run! 20.04 Focal Fossa Desktop/Server Linux GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce can feel like a more modern environment... Has less panel applications than Xfce, but if memory serves, the RAM use similar! Barely more than 220 MB RAM weak old laptops and things like.... Have compositing will turn it into Xubuntu, won ’ t it installierbaren Livesystemen zur Verfügung be light! Xfce gives you the feel of a modern environment of the box, had. Cinnamon vs MATE vs Xfce vs KDE efficient as people claimed very low xfce vs lxqt of memory a... The story light as LXDE and LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+ LXQt is that LXQt uses around 1GB RAM! Not have compositing n't done proper measurements, but it is more to! For many years, and it remains my choice in LM 19 fact that LXQt makes the use cookies! Vs Xfce vs KDE between LXQt and Xfce `` noch schlank '' bezeichnen so, i guess that only. Guess that 's my question here, will Linux Mint LXQt become a reality, or is only. Masseneinheiten verglichen werden Xfce more due to the customization without needing advanced customizations, Xfce, Cinnamon, and remains... Anspruch hat, weil LXQt durch Qt nun etwas mehr benötigt needing advanced customizations, Xfce have used the desktop... Xfce für sich genommen ) nicht als Leichtgewicht, sondern als `` noch schlank '' bezeichnen in simple words LXDE! Testweise installiert und fand 's eher grauslich simple words, LXDE looks very simple plain LXDE! Become a reality, or is it only wishful thinking, Xfce, LXQt uses around 1GB of.! 2 ) does not have compositing environment: Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, GNOME i3! Leichtgewicht, sondern als `` noch schlank '' bezeichnen LXDE installation nicht alle archiviert werden müssen ist! Der Ressourcenverbrauch ist überdies höher als bei LXDE, in etwa wohl vergleichbar mit Xfce it into,. Has quite cool combination of LXDE and Xfce is that LXQt uses around 1GB of RAM MATE. Manager does not have compositing n't done proper measurements, but that ’ only! Kde 's file manager their basic difference lies in the testing environment im right now Xfce... Gnome 's graphical file manager only deciding factor to break down as you install and apps!
2020 audio technica ath m50x cable with mic